Which would you choose?

Which of these do you find easiest to play? :point_down:

:green_circle: Sit & Go – Fast, straightforward, and perfect for beginners
:yellow_circle: Freerolls – No buy-in, no pressure, just play!
:large_blue_circle: Single-Table Tournaments – Fewer players, easier strategy
:purple_circle: Turbo Tournaments – Quick action, quick results

2 Likes

Sit & go

2 Likes

Same I play mostly sit and go if there’s a wait i do some jackpot sit and go since it’s only 3 players and quick

1 Like

Thanks for the feedback @susie0305 and @btwsig22

“Easiest” to play is sort of misleading. They’re all easy to play. Hard to play well. I mean, I can teach a 5 year old how to play chess in like 10 minutes. He’ll know how the pieces move. After a little bit he’d be able to play an actual game of chess. But he’d suck at the game. Sit and Go’s have the lowest variance of the above mentioned structures (i’m just ignoring freerolls). But you are forced to make ICM decisions pretty regularly and if you’re unfamiliar, you can make really expensive mistakes. Everyone should just play cash anyway. Tournaments are goofy af. People get drawn in by the GTD and never see how brutal variance is for full time MTT players. I’m losing money losing money losing money losing money… for like a while, weeks… maybe months… Then, if they’re lucky they’ll bink one before they go bankrupt. Rinse lather repeat. idk. Plus tournie guys are usually a bit less (let me choose a diplomatic term) precise in their play. Because they can get away with a bit more. At the end of the day a big sunday $109 is done and over in like 300 hands wire to wire. And ANYBODY can run like a god for 300 hands.